Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 173 User benchmarks, average bench 86% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 880 78% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,171 72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23% Poor	Lighting 28.8 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 27.4 24% 28.8 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 27.5 22% 27 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 38 43 43 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	394% Outstanding	Read 4,074 Write 43.7 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 39.2 221% 1,061 MB/s	4K Read 566 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 5.2 865% 191 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 394% Great: 292%
Crucial_ CT960M50 960GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 810GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 177 180 160 147 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 334 Write 317 Mixed 266 SusWrite 185 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 19.7 69% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 97.2 81% 117 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 63%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 240GB free Firmware: 4V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 101 93 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 120 Write 122 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 96.1 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 48.7 MC Write 44.9 MC Mixed 38.5 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 19.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	130x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	178x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16