Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 112 2-Core 228 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 570 62% 491 Pts	64-Core 602 37% 602 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 392.56 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 26.6 11% 22.7 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 27 22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OSSD240GBTSS2 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 14 8.3 17 68 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 337 Write 103 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 87.8 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 10.4 47% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.2 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 14.5 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 78%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 764GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 712GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 424 427 422 409 410 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 588GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 106 108 111 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 108 Write 61.2 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 108 64% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A2G40DB0-CPB 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.7% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 19.6 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	4x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN512HMJP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 108%, 315 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 296 samples	3x
HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 32GBHynixBench 87%, 3 samples	1x
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 124 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16