Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120420
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 521 58% 459 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PNY(196E 0997) 1GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 21.2 14% 18.1 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 15.2 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 120 105 106 91 101 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 280 Write 143 Mixed 169 SusWrite 103 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 28.4 101% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 34.8 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 39.1 41% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 73%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 211GB free Firmware: CP100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 76.3 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 60.4 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 597GB free Firmware: ST6OA3CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 98.4 Write 86.8 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 60.4 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-193.A00LF 2x2GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	161x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $216

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16