Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 17:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 118
51% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 267.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 157 74 82 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 207
Write 197
Mixed 193
SusWrite 130
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 18.4
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 25.9
62% 130 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 134%
Netac OnlyDisk 64GB
49GB free, PID 2004, netac
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 14 11 14 13 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 11.9
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.2
92% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback