Asrock H61M-HVGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HVGS  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 11:40
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 356
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 64 100 76 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 74
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G6K1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback