Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '20 at 12:37
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 102 2-Core 199 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 699 66% 549 Pts	64-Core 1,101 68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 3060) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.19 3% 3.99 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 2.73 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 512GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 609 615 615 602 609 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 657 Write 557 Mixed 465 SusWrite 599 128% 569 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 32.3 109% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 68.2 DQ Mixed 34.9 30% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 122%
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203 1,730 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 148GB free Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 282 287 226 224 242 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 453 Write 448 Mixed 359 SusWrite 249 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 36.3 128% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 268 217% 306 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 105%
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203 1,730 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 77GB free Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 281 253 258 224 241 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 418 Write 473 Mixed 358 SusWrite 248 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 36.1 127% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 155 97% 105 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 105%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 26GB free Firmware: JURA0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 468 Mixed 455 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 42.3 132% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 35.1 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 238 132% 122 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 109%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 110GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 104 111 175 221 184 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 496 Write 468 Mixed 451 SusWrite 170 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 41.6 130% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 328 248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 109%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 23 Mixed 11 SusWrite 26.9 33% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.4 162% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 46%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 64GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 34GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 91.2 Write 86.9 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 87.6 110% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 4.6 297% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 2,702 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 51 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 43.1 131% 45.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 21.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	528x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $864

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16