Asus PP-DLW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIntel E7505+ICH4
MotherboardAsus PP-DLW  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20041116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 02:54
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 57.7
37% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 77.5
10% 76.7 Pts
64-Core 80
5% 80 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Sapphire(174B 0028) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 2.06
6% 6.5 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 11.9
6% 7.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 500GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 68 76 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 91
Write 72.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 72
53% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.99% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback