Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3113B96

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 3113B96  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3113B96
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 02:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 620
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 118
51% 84 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 129
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 193 134 73 78 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 235
Write 160
Mixed 205
SusWrite 126
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 18.4
65% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 136
113% 164 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 99%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
25GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 18.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 20.8
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G1600L81S 802C 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback