HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 04:57
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 29
2-Core 54.8
23% 37.8 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 180
18% 147 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1909) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 3.41
2% 3.88 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT42L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 107 126 129 129 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 238
Write 105
Mixed 106
SusWrite 124
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 7.5
28% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 23.1
DQ Mixed 25.2
19% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 65%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 04TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 157 170 181 186 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 351
Write 178
Mixed 228
SusWrite 177
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 7.8
29% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 22.2
18% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
332GB free
Firmware: GH2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 119
71% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GLSTU160N02 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback