Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 14:40
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 737
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 7.53
6% 27 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 15
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 92 79 73 59 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 367
Write 92
Mixed 136
SusWrite 73.5
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 14.7
79% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 111
94% 141 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 101 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 82.8
Write 132
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96.3
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 71%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 800f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 1.7
2% 1.92 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 26.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback