Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.92% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60-$28 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Memory 55.7 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 56.7 32% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 57.3 8-Core 58.4 8% 57.8 Pts	64-Core 57.2 4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Runcore SSD 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110419 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 15 19 22 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Read 82.3 Write 12.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 25.5 8% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 11% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16HTF25664HY-800J3 2x2GB 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16