| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision M6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0D138P |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130605 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 15 '20 at 06:24 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T9800-$75
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
44.7%
Average
|
44% 66.2 Pts
|
8% 61.2 Pts
|
4% 59.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M
Dell(1028 019C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
|
6.25%
Terrible
|
7% 5.92 fps
|
5% 5.93 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 101 90 52 51 52 MB/s
|
23%
Poor
|
29% 131 MB/s
|
36% 8.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.5%
Very poor
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
48% 82.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6400 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $219Bench 46%, 660 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 30x |
| Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 20x |
| FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $278 |