HP ProBook 645 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5550M APU-$80
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 92.9
47% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 151
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.38
Parallax 4.44
4% 5.61 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 7.78
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320VM001-1AD142 320GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 63 69 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 70.6
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 57.3
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5674QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G1 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback