Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca) 1,594 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Memory 40.2 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 37.7 22% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 38 8-Core 41.8 5% 39.9 Pts	64-Core 39 2% 39 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0123) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.35 Parallax 1.91 1% 2.25 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 64GB 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 49 20 26 29 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	23% Poor	Read 194 Write 179 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 39.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 1 36% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 79.1 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 0.9 20% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 51%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 114 124 127 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 109 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 124 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BRAN51244GB16C1333 1x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16