Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook S13 X330FA_S330FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook S13 X330FA_S330FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X330FA
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 17:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 201
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 323
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1631) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 6.72
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 435 412 409 417 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 741
Write 706
Mixed 628
SusWrite 432
141% 627 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 26.5
178% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 671
534% 748 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 142%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L256M32D1PF-09 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S13 X330FA_S330FA Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S13 X330FA_S330FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback