Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5502 94 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 79.8 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 93 48% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 91.1 8-Core 91.8 12% 91.4 Pts	64-Core 87.1 5% 87.1 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.91% Terrible	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 9.41 10% 10.7 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 10 Splatting 14.9 10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.91% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 56 64 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 100 Write 98.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 56.6 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 54GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 17 18 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 18.2 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 16.5 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.7 176% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16