Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory42.4 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '17 at 09:20
Run Duration474 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 145
54% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 578
51% 433 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5600
Nvidia(10DE 0409) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 2.78
5% 5.34 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 5.78
5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
68GB free
Firmware: 5.8. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 239
Write 95.8
Mixed 106
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 14.6
59% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 87.4
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 26
40% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 80%
OCZ Vertex 450 128GB-$80
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 213
Write 66.3
Mixed 92.6
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 5.36
23% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 82.1
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 36.5
34% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
653GB free
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 168
Mixed 85.7
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.18
83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
387GB free
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 148
Mixed 10.9
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback