Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Thirdwave GKF1050TGT (all builds)
Motherboard	To GH5KN57-rev01
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 182 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 488 51% 409 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1D05 102E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 7.16 6% 7.69 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 13.7 8% 9.84 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(1D05 102E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 40.3 33% 36.8 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 34.6 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 31 33 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 2,797 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 69 116 45 68 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 397 Write 358 Mixed 242 SusWrite 81.2 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 23.3 103% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 171 178% 293 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 134%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 684GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 31.3 Write 32.3 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 36.8 44% 32 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB 3,102 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.2% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 18.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16