TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)

Average Bench: 30.4% (113th of 643)

Based on 75,097 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1C8C Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Poor: 22%Average: 30.4% Great: 34%

Popular builds with this GPU

Poor average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) averaged 69.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 115fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 112fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) is just 11.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 74.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 112fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 75,097 samples)
Rank 11330.4%
Min Avg Max
30 Lighting 115 132
30 Reflection 74.6 83.1
84.7 Parallax 112 130
30.2% 101 fps
Min Avg Max
58.2 MRender 77 83.6
82.2 Gravity 112 125
60 Splatting 76.3 85.4
30.6% 88.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 0798) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
32.5% Below average
Lighting 123
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 122
32% 108 fps
MRender 81.8
Gravity 120
Splatting 82.4
33% 94.7 fps
Clevo(1558 6450) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
32.4% Below average
Lighting 123
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 120
32% 107 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 120
Splatting 81.4
33% 93.6 fps
Acer(1025 1260) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4223
32% Below average
Lighting 120
Reflection 77.2
Parallax 106
32% 101 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 118
Splatting 81.6
32% 93.3 fps
Clevo(1558 6450) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5206
32% Below average
Lighting 127
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 117
34% 108 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 118
Splatting 80.2
32% 92.8 fps
HP(103C 8259) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
30.6% Below average
Lighting 122
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 114
32% 104 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 112
Splatting 77.5
31% 89.4 fps
Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
30.4% Below average
Lighting 115
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 102
30% 96 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 112
Splatting 77.3
30% 89 fps
Acer(1025 1263) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5638
21.4% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 70
8% 43.3 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 62.9
22% 67.3 fps
75,097 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,092,747 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 75,097 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Dell(1028 0798) 11% 30% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 39D0) 8% 31% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1265) 6% 32% ± 2%
Asus(1043 18FE) 6% 31% ± 2%
Acer(1025 118B) 5% 30% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 39FD) 4% 31% ± 4%
Dell(1028 086F) 4% 32% ± 1%
MSI(1462 11C8) 4% 31% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1071) 4% 31% ± 4%
Asus(1043 15E0) 3% 30% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1590) 3% 30% ± 3%
HP(103C 838F) 3% 28% ± 5%
Dell(1028 0824) 3% 29% ± 8%
Dell(1028 07FA) 2% 29% ± 7%
Clevo(1558 850A) 2% 31% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1263) 2% 29% ± 5%
Device(1D05 1042) 2% 32% ± 1%
HP(103C 8259) 2% 30% ± 3%
HP(103C 84DA) 2% 30% ± 4%
Asus(1043 1041) 2% 32% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1128) 2% 30% ± 5%
MSI(1462 1221) 1% 29% ± 6%
Asus(1043 1A4E) 1% 28% ± 6%
Acer(1025 1260) 1% 31% ± 4%
MSI(1462 121A) 1% 31% ± 4%
HP(103C 8478) 1% 31% ± 2%
MSI(1462 11C9) 1% 32% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1197) 1% 28% ± 5%
MSI(1462 1219) 1% 32% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0870) 1% 32% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1267) 1% 28% ± 6%
Clevo(1558 852B) 1% 32% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 39FC) 1% 28% ± 7%
HP(103C 825D) 1% 31% ± 1%
Acer(1025 142A) 1% 31% ± 3%
HP(103C 8469) 1% 31% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 651A) 1% 31% ± 0%
Asus(1043 182E) 1% 29% ± 2%
HP(103C 8392) 1% 29% ± 4%
Device(1D05 102E) 0% 33% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1199) 0% 31% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 5066) 0% 31% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 39F8) 0% 29% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 872B) 0% 31% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 77FE) 0% 18% ± 0%
MSI(1462 1222) 0% 32% ± 0%
Quanta(152D 1188) 0% 22% ± 0%
Device(1D05 103C) 0% 31% ± 0%
Acer(1025 1207) 0% 31% ± 0%
Quanta(152D 1194) 0% 32% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) Builds (Compare 4,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Dell Inspiron 15 7000 Gaming - $650

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 71%, 372,267 samples2,894x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 68%, 117,853 samples1,944x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 71%, 1 sample1x
GPU
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 30%, 75,097 samples2,021x
SSD
X400 M.2 2280 256GBSandiskBench 68%, 7,021 samples319x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 63%, 8,402 samples316x
THNSNK128GVN8 M.2 2280 128GBToshibaBench 54%, 4,029 samples314x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 98,598 samples1,124x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 14,289 samples576x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 26,380 samples282x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $650

Popular GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
6,900

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

19 hrs ago.

RUS-User
Avatar level
3,916

Excellent

29 days ago.

MORE GAME HAVE 60fps(MAX QUALITI in FULL HD REZOLUTION). Best in the best for this money

CAN-User
Avatar level
3,646

Excellent

29 days ago.

Pretty great card, I mean for the price it delivers good, at least to me. Play most games perfectly fine, on high settings. It is noisy though, but unless you are planning to use it on a library all should be fine. Btw, also good for rendering, not perfect or great, but not bad. I use it for architectural renderings (student) and I'm fine.

FRA-User
Avatar level
3,537

Good

2 months ago.

A good card with good performance. Unfortunately it overheats too much in my ASUS ROG FX753VD (It's probably a design flaw from the laptop, only one fan to cool down the CPU and GPU, both going up to nearly 90 degrees celsius before going in thermal throttling mode, decreasing the performance drastically.). I have the 4GB version which seemingly goes between the TI variant and the regular one in terms of performance.

BRA-User
Avatar level
3,509

Good

1 month ago.

Works for most recent game just fine, could be better of course, but still good for 2019

JPN-User
Avatar level
2,814

Poor

1 month ago.

Back in 2017 it was pretty decent for a $900 laptop. But in 2020 it has aged so poorly to the point where it will not be able to run any new title even at low settings. Unless if you have a time machine, just completely skip this card at all costs.

VNM-User
Avatar level
2,715

Excellent

14 months ago.

It's like boneless meat, got it 2 years ago, still works like a charm :›

PHL-User
Avatar level
2,340

Excellent

14 months ago.

It's actually a good card. It can play numerous games 2015-2016 games on 60 fps on Ultra. Even with its ups and downs, surprisingly it can run games like AC Unity, Call of Duty WW2, etc. The best games that this beast GPU can play is Overwatch at 100+ fps on Ultra with an i7 7700HQ. I suggest buying an Asus Strix GL553VE or anything that has this with an I7 7700HQ! It's awesome!

THA-User
Avatar level
2,328

Good

3 months ago.

Use it with a I5-8300H cpu, 16GB ram and a SSD. I am very happy with this setup and can recommend it for !

BEL-User
Avatar level
1,854

Excellent

14 months ago.

Great for overwatch fortnite and a lot of others games

RavenBailiff
Avatar level
304

Poor

10 months ago.

Pretty bad for a $1500+ laptop.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3080
vs Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2060
vs Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
vs AMD RX 590
vs AMD RX 5700

643 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $468Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback