Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz) 925 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 38.8 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 30.9 20% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 60.7 8-Core 60.2 8% 60.5 Pts	64-Core 60.4 4% 60.4 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8250 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.09% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.09% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT42B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 237 295 300 301 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 375 Write 330 Mixed 334 SusWrite 291 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 22.5 73% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 95.4 76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16