Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 1810T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 1810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Base Board Product Name
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090625
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 01:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 54.5
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 13.2
24% 28.7 Pts
4-Core 17.6
8-Core 17.6
2% 17.6 Pts
64-Core 17.9
1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.29 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 117 172 171 181 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 213
Write 185
Mixed 191
SusWrite 165
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 16.6
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.4
DQ Write 33.9
DQ Mixed 37.5
29% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1810T Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback