Supermicro X8DAH+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X8DAH+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DAH+
Memory53.3 GB free of 56.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 09:07
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 542
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 64.3
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 52.8
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 480GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 186 8.5 6.4 157 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 264
Write 236
Mixed 240
SusWrite 101
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 19.9
104% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 24.6
53% 107 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54%
Great: 102%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
195GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 259 259 262 262 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 542
Write 634
Mixed 574
SusWrite 295
115% 511 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 45.8
154% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 588
463% 642 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 141%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
543GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 70 73 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,677
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,737
SusWrite 75.5
295% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 51.6
179% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 202
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 236%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$130
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 204 204 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 200
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 205
126% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
236% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 330 334 329 335 331 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 97% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ATMEL 26DF321 92GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback