Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCompaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON NARRA5
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 04:50
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 38
2-Core 76.4
40% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 152
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1312) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 19 47 46 22 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 83.1
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 37.8
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
27GB free
Firmware: JF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 59 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 61.1
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 58.5
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD080HJ/P 80GB-$25
21GB free
Firmware: ZH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 39.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 32.7
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 33%
Jmicron Generic 400GB
60GB free
Firmware: 9201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 14.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 11.3
10% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HM250HI 250GB
201GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 13.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 10.4
18% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 19%
Generic External 80GB
12GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.7 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.5
9% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback