Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2286M 989 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 214 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 598 61% 492 Pts	64-Core 955 59% 955 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 98%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 860C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 7.81 6% 8.65 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 15.4 10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro T1000 3,238 User benchmarks, average bench 37% HP(103C 860C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.46 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34% Below average	Lighting 43.3 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 35.3 35% 39 fps	MRender 40.6 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 38.1 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GB 3,035 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10112006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,279 Write 1,038 Mixed 1,014 247% 1,110 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 40.6 132% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 735 DQ Write 988 DQ Mixed 805 624% 843 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 267%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GB 3,035 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 18GB free Firmware: 10112006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,501 Write 1526 Mixed 1385 329% 1,471 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 42.7 146% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 788 DQ Write 982 DQ Mixed 826 639% 865 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 267%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GB 3,035 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 42GB free Firmware: 10112006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,278 Write 1,364 Mixed 1,226 288% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 43.5 138% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 788 DQ Write 1,032 DQ Mixed 827 647% 882 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 267%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 363GB free Firmware: RPM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 141 44 95 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 81.5 Write 114 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 116 65% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 4x16GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.2% Very good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.3 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	227x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	116x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	78x

SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	62x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	56x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	83x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	37x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 81%, 4,947 samples	30x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16