Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	7.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 8 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 55.8 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 166 57% 103 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 177 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-0Q 18 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 114C) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 442.06 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 19.3 17% 21.3 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 26.9 21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 215GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: PVS SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 151 232 229 237 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 230 Write 67.5 Mixed 94.8 SusWrite 186 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 7 30% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 7.4 DQ Write 7.8 DQ Mixed 6.4 5% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 42%
Xensrc PVDISK 43GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 36GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 55 48 86 84 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x7GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 34.8 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x