Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QR
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 59
2-Core 90.4
44% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 170
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 535
Asus(1043 113F) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.22.10
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 11.6
6% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.68 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 68 55 104 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 70.1
Write 110
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 75.1
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QR_X510QR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback