Samsung R530/R730/P530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung R530/R730/P530  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R530/R730/P530
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 11:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 110
47% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 74
16% 109 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 54 47 70 70 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 107
Write 93.1
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 66.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R530/R730/P530 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R530/R730/P530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback