Shanghai CND001 ND001EB1_7BMB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShanghai CND001 ND001EB1_7BMB  (all builds)
MotherboardShanghai CND001 ND001EB1_7BMB
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '17 at 03:44
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
C-OctaCore FC-1080@2.0GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 52.5
32% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 191
18% 148 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 LENOVO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABW0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 7.78
57% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.12
55% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
1GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 22
Write 8.12
Mixed 10
14% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.19
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.009
9% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback