Dixonsxp MS-7255

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDixonsxp MS-7255  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7255
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6300-$40
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Memory 13.8
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 41.5
14% 25.3 Pts
4-Core 42
8-Core 41.5
6% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 42.4
3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
Sapphire(174B 5920) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 56 59 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 47.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 56.5
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 370
11% 370 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback