Asus NCT-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus NCT-D (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK NCT-D
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '17 at 09:46
Run Duration	1397 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3.20GHz 11 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Memory 10.6 1-Core 14.4 2-Core 17.6 9% 14.2 Pts	4-Core 25.4 8-Core 26.3 3% 25.8 Pts	64-Core 26.9 2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 59GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 89 117584338 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5504 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 575013709 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15581 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3909 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 44 454754331 (C2) HDA temperature 27 56 73014444059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 49 70575422 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.4% Poor	Read 57.5 Write 41.4 Mixed 21.4 29% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.28 68% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 42%
Seagate ST340014A 40GB-$43 906 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 13GB free Firmware: 8.54 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 63 58 107439103 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1860 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 483396768 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10265 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4827 (C2) HDA temperature 23 58 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 58 107439103 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	23.9% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 41 Mixed 25.8 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.33 73% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 31%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$41 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 132 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2589 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26871 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2551 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2589 (C2) HDA temperature 112 89 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	42.1% Average	Read 64.2 Write 82.5 Mixed 23.1 41% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.37 87% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 179GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB 0h DDR Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.6% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 1.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 398 10% 398 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus NCT-D

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)