Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 66.6 32% 50.9 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 154 17% 136 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 39CE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 10 Parallax 5.62 5% 7.11 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 5 Splatting 11.3 6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70 2,931 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 206 187 207 177 184 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 475 Write 500 Mixed 473 SusWrite 224 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 14.1 43% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 110 86% 119 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 242%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905630-031.A00G 1x16GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	278x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	37x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	16x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	27x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	19x
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	17x

RAM
M471A5143SB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 35%, 2,061 samples	38x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 13,320 samples	30x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	28x