Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '20 at 10:45
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 47.4 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 123 44% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 122 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla V100-PCIE-16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 113% Nvidia(10DE 1214) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 438 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 391.81 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.6% Outstanding	Lighting 95.9 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 217 78% 130 fps	MRender 149 Gravity 194 Splatting 112 120% 152 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 135%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 210 177 183 172 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 282 Write 323 Mixed 290 SusWrite 176 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 16.3 55% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 21.7 DQ Mixed 40.9 55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 28.6 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499