MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200420
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 117 49% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 194 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Lighting 9.97 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 12.9 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 7.81 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 125 117 128 132 129 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 236 Write 178 Mixed 176 SusWrite 138 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 18.1 64% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 49.6 DQ Write 50.9 DQ Mixed 46.7 36% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 313GB free Firmware: AM0P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 61 57 60 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 52.6 Write 52.4 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 57.5 34% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905713-017.A00G 2x4GB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.4 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	301x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	221x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16