Today's hottest deals

Asus 1215B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1215B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1215B
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 09:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 49.4
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 34.8
25% 34.9 Pts
4-Core 40.5
8-Core 39.5
5% 40 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Asus(1043 84E3) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
0.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.28%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 48 57 60 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 72.6
Write 69
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 57.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 3.8
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1215B Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback