Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 85.1 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 65.1 43% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 99.2 8-Core 111 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.25 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.35 1% 1.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow M3 240GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0111A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 82 89 88 92 88 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 178 Write 186 Mixed 122 SusWrite 85 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 3.9 38% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 6.7 17% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS723216A7A364 160GB 340 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 149GB free Firmware: EC1ZB70B SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 94 92 95 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 97.8 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 90.7 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RM25664BC1339.8FD 0443 RMT3020EF48E8W1333 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16