Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55M-UD2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 12:19
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 280
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Gigabyte(1458 34D3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 2.88
5% 4.11 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 2.35
3% 3.74 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 133 120 147 158 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 118
Write 149
Mixed 129
SusWrite 137
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 15.9
58% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 48.1
DQ Mixed 21.4
20% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 99%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
144GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 111 104 117 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 119
Write 124
Mixed 50
SusWrite 114
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 17.7
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 21.3
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 17.6
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback