Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 91.9 49% 75.4 Pts	4-Core 86.7 8-Core 149 14% 118 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Lighting 8.53 Reflection 6.12 Parallax 7.5 7% 7.38 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 7.03 Splatting 11.1 7% 8.44 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 191 57 94 62 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 398 Write 352 Mixed 119 SusWrite 109 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 15.3 37% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 35.4 28% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 90%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 444GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 137 139 138 137 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 139 Write 143 Mixed 74 SusWrite 137 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 0.4 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16