Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio One 1909

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio One 1909  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VWC5F
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 01 '17 at 01:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 90.3
45% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 83.5
12% 86.2 Pts
64-Core 50
3% 50 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400
Dell(1028 02B6) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.19
1% 0.98 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A120G 240GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 263
Write 149
Mixed 174
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 17
54% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 82.7
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 53.3
41% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio One 1909 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio One 1909

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback