Toshiba EQUIUM M40X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba EQUIUM M40X  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA EAL30
Memory0.3 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 22:24
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 47.4
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 8.5
18% 20.9 Pts
4-Core 10.9
8-Core 11.9
2% 11.4 Pts
64-Core 13.8
1% 13.8 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LQ100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 9.8 9 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Read 10.6
Write 12
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 12.1
8% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 34%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
57GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.1 8.1 8.7 8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 7.9
11% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
84% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 512 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.48% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback