Asus P4C800-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (4GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
MotherboardAsus P4C800-E  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20050804
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '15 at 12:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 52.6
22% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 52.7
8-Core 52.5
7% 52.6 Pts
64-Core 49.8
3% 49.8 Pts
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800
AMD(1002 9505) 512MB
Driver: ati2dvag.dll Ver. 6.14.10.7267
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1.97
4% 2.82 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD30EFRX-68EUZN0 802GB
565GB free
Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 89
Write 80.7
Mixed 87
65% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.23
110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 70
Write 65.3
Mixed 22.1
38% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.31
77% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 43%
Typical P4C800-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P4C800-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback