Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E4200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E4200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X253R
Memory4 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 15:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9600
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 41
32% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 42.9
8-Core 44
6% 43.5 Pts
64-Core 43.9
3% 43.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Dell(1028 0277) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.31 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.27%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-CS3 TM 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 39 47 38 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 154
Write 54.3
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 39
18% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 2.9
20% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 30%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
173GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 17
Write 17.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 19.1
25% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback