Dell Studio XPS 1647

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 1647  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05P36G
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '15 at 16:27
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 131
46% 101 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730
Dell(1028 0419) 1GB
Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.692.1.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 5.03
5% 5.98 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 6.57
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 230
Write 182
Mixed 163
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 11.9
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 42.2
46% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 124%
WD Elements 10A2 750GB
615GB free, PID 10a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.5
27% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.23
71% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 44%
Typical Studio XPS 1647 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 1647

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback