| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3161-A1 |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141201 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 05 '20 at 12:41 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.6%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
26% 200 Pts
|
13% 207 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E127) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
1.2%
Terrible
|
1% 1.7 fps
|
1% 1.62 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 15 41 42 55 MB/s
|
20.7%
Poor
|
25% 34.6 MB/s
|
88% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
128GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 114 113 113 113 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
75% 102 MB/s
|
164% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.9%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
24% 8.5 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 639 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 231x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 97x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |