Today's hottest deals

Asus G50VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G50VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G50VT
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$199
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 85.6
44% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 84.6
11% 84.3 Pts
64-Core 83.8
5% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M-GS
Asus(1043 1992) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 7.38
Parallax 1.72
4% 4.76 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 199 217 219 224 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 244
Write 234
Mixed 232
SusWrite 204
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 31.6
87% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 144
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 123%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
184GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 14 11 20 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G50VT Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G50VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback