Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac12,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple iMac12,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B59F58194171B
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 04:35
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500S
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 122
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 224
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700M
Apple(106B 6740) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 6.34
7% 7.56 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 8.78
6% 7.48 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 74 85 47 36 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 88.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 57.2
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,2 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback