MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMar 14 '17 at 10:24
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 818
76% 635 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2012 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 106
Parallax 91.3
87% 101 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 93.4
76% 93 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000
568GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0174 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,299
Write 1,145
Mixed 1,536
366% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 50.7
248% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 239
291% 517 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 265%
Great: 250%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 145
Write 147
Mixed 83.8
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 3.54
4K Mixed 0.52
171% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84%
Great: 121%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
611GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
611GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 237
Write 209
Mixed 192
159% 213 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 3.97
4K Mixed 0.39
150% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 128%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
74GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 100
Write 72.7
Mixed 6.55
43% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
10GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 62.9
Mixed 27
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.44
95% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 56.3
161% 56.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 141%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback