Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac19,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple iMac19,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-63001698E7A34814
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 12:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 429
50% 386 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Apple(106B 019F) 2GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 23.1
16% 22 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 27.2
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 46 43 42 43 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 69.9
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 44
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.5
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,2 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac19,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback