Acer Aspire 7750G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 7750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE70_HR
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime25.6 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 110
52% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 160
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6850M
Acer(1025 050E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.822.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 4.34
3% 3.69 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 3.26
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9640320AS 640GB-$270
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 64 52 66 73 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 40.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 60.6
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
SD Card 0GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1
2% 2.33 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 7750G Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 7750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback