Lenovo 20FAS3J300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FAS3J300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS3J300
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190806
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 14:25
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 52%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 97.8
47% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 135
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7812
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0
Parallax 0
0% 0.01 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 13.7
8% 9.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S512G1001 512GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3551001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 35 87 71 138 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 349
Write 241
Mixed 101
SusWrite 86.6
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 24.8
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 2.7
69% 167 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FAS3J300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FAS3J300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback