To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 127
45% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 558
50% 421 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 31
Parallax 57.9
38% 45.1 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 39.4
32% 38.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 30 37 48 43 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 453
Write 391
Mixed 338
SusWrite 38.4
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 19.7
73% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 39
53% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
851GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 81.4
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
673GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 62 58 61 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 78.4
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 59.6
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 98 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 95.3
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 180 178 176 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 181
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 176
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback